Use cases

Different plants. One discipline.

The vocabulary changes from a cashew line to a palm oil mill to an intake centre. The method does not: capture the work where it happens, show it live, flag what leaves its approved range, and put the decision in front of the right person with the reasoning attached. Every system also answers questions in plain language, so a manager can ask the plant what happened instead of asking for a report.

Production floor

Plants and mills record everything and see little of it in time. Station sheets, shift logs and spreadsheets carry the most important figures, and management receives them days or weeks later. The machines are not connected to anything, and they do not need to be: we capture at the station, from the scale, the sheet, the counter or the camera.

Production floor · 01 · Cashew processing

A cashew plant that captures every kilogram, at every station.

Côte d'Ivoire grows more cashew than any other country and exports most of it raw. Processors who add value locally compete with Vietnam and India on conversion cost and consistency. Even a modern automated line sends twenty to thirty per cent of its kernels to manual finishing, and the whole line still runs on paper.

The challengeTen stations from raw nut reception to export, each writing lot number, weight in, weight out and loss on a sheet. Sheets re-typed into spreadsheets. Kernel outturn per lot unknown until the season closes. Work in progress valued by estimate.
Where it bitesManual peeling is paid by the kilogram. The paper tally is the payroll, the productivity record and the yield figure at once, and it cannot be reconciled against a scale in time. A lot that sits too long at a station is found weeks later, in the margin.
What we buildCapture at every station: tablet, scale and lot or operator code where the hardware exists, photographed sheets read and checked where it does not. A lot-level mass balance from reception to container, with a dwell target for every station.
VisibilityLive views for the plant manager, the finance director and the board: production against plan, yield and loss by station, grade mix against budget, cost per kilogram, operator productivity, work in progress by age, export pipeline.
Red flagsA lot beyond its station dwell target. A station loss outside the band for that grade. A manual peeling tally that does not reconcile with the scale. Each arrives as an exception with the lot, the station and the evidence, not as a figure buried in a report.
Payroll and traceabilityPiece-rate pay computed from the same record the yield comes from. Each carton traceable to its lot, its stations and its operators, as food-safety certification expects.
SystemsRuns alongside the accounting system. The database and its history belong to the plant.
Ask the plant

Which lots have been at peeling longer than target?

Two. CS26-084 at machine peeling for 11.6 days against a target of 9, and CS26-089 at manual peeling for 8.0 days against 7. Both arrived in week 42. The first is waiting on a sorter changeover logged at 06:40. Lot timelines attached.

Lot 21B · mass balanceLive
01Reception24,000
02Calibration23,640
03Steaming23,400
04Shelling6,260
05Drying5,880
06AAuto peel4,120
06BManual peel1,590
07Colour sort5,510
08Grading5,470
09Packing5,430
Production KOR 22.6 kg / 100 kgWholes 79%Manual share 28%Cycle time 19 d
Lots to watch · open lots, oldest handoff firstIllustrative
LotStationQuantity · ageStatus
CS26-084 Bondoukou · received 18 OctMachine peel4,557 kg · 11.6 dOver target
CS26-083 Bouaké · received 17 OctHeat treatment3,168 kg · 12.4 dIn progress
CS26-085 Tiébissou · received 18 OctPacking3,200 kg · 10.9 dIn progress
CS26-089 Bouaké · received 21 OctManual peel3,922 kg · 8.0 dOver target
CS26-088 Tiébissou · received 20 OctHeat treatment3,805 kg · 8.8 dIn progress
Work in progress 74.7 t in 12 open lots · 2 beyond dwell target · Figures are examples, not client data.
Production floor · 02 · Palm oil mill

A palm oil mill that knows its extraction rate by shift, not by month.

A mill is a chain of stations that each lose a little oil: the sterilisers, the thresher, the presses, the clarifiers. The fruit arrives by the truckload from plantations and smallholders, the oil leaves by the tanker, and the number everyone watches, the extraction rate, is usually computed once a month from the tank dips. By then nobody can say which shift, which press or which supplier moved it.

The challengeFruit received on weighbridge tickets, station readings on shift sheets, stoppages in a logbook, oil stock from a tank dip, each in its own place and its own format. The extraction rate is a monthly figure. Losses by station are sampled by the laboratory and filed.
Where it bitesOne point of extraction rate on a mill is a large sum over a season. A press running below pressure, a steriliser cycle cut short, a batch of over-ripe fruit, a leaking clarifier: each costs oil for days before the month-end figure shows it, and by then the cause is cold.
What we buildCapture at each station from what is already there: the weighbridge, the shift sheet photographed and read, the laboratory sample, the logbook entry, a camera on the tipping bay. Fruit in, oil and kernel out, losses by station and stoppages with their causes, reconciled per shift.
VisibilityLive views for the mill manager, the plantation manager and the board: throughput against capacity, extraction rate and kernel rate by shift and by day, oil losses by station against their bands, stoppages and their causes, fruit quality by supplier, oil stock reconciled to dispatch.
Red flagsExtraction rate below the approved band for a shift. A station loss above its band. An unplanned stoppage over its threshold. Tank stock that does not reconcile with production and dispatch. Each raised the same day, with the readings behind it.
SystemsRuns alongside the accounting system and the laboratory records. Nothing on the mill needs to be connected to a network for the figures to be live.
Ask the plant

Why was extraction low on Tuesday?

Tuesday closed at 20.2% against a band of 21 to 23. Press 2 ran below pressure for 3.5 hours after the 09:40 stop, and fibre loss on that line was 7.9% against a 6.5% average. Fruit quality by supplier was unchanged from Monday. Maintenance log and station readings attached.

Mill board · shift 2 · 14:10Live
Fruit processed · shift212t88% of shift capacity · 14 loads tipped
Extraction rate · shift21.4%Band 21 to 23 · kernel rate 4.6%
Oil loss in empty bunches3.1%Above band · limit 2.8% · steriliser 1 cycle short
Oil stock vs book1,012t−0.3% tank dip against production and dispatch
Stoppages · today
TimeStationMinutesCause 06:52Steriliser 118Door seal 09:40Press 230Low pressure, hydraulics 12:15Thresher9Blockage cleared
Illustrative. Figures are examples, not client data.
Intake and logistics

Before the factory there are the trucks: raw material bought at collection centres, weighed, paid for, moved to the mill and weighed again. The gaps between those weights are where a plant loses margin without seeing it.

Intake and logistics · 03 · Collection and intake centres

Collection centres where management sees the path to the goal, and every ticket has its evidence.

A processor buying from thousands of farmers runs a network of collection centres. Each receives raw material by truck, tricycle and cart, weighs it full and empty, pays the farmer on the difference, stores it, and sends it on to the factory by the lorry-load. Management set a target for the season. The question every week is whether each centre is on the path to it, and whether what was paid for is what arrived.

TodayEach weighing opens a ticket in the ERP: driver, supplier, vehicle, plate, gross, tare, net. How a centre is doing against the target is known at month end, from an extract. Transfers to the factory are compared by eye and by weight on arrival. The centre is emptied and counted once a season, if there is time, and the loss is discovered then.
Where it bitesA centre that falls behind in week three is found in week eight. Unexplained loss between purchase and factory gate runs to several per cent of volume. Moisture and handling explain part of it. Owners already suspect that theft explains the rest, and what they lack is the evidence and the number, per centre, per truck, per week.
Part one · Performance and the path to the goalEach centre measured against its own recorded history and the season target: volumes received, purchase price and cost per tonne, loss to the factory, days of stock. A status for each centre and for the whole network, with the trend behind it, in a daily and weekly report to management. Which centres are ahead, which are slipping, and since when.
Part two · Control on tickets and transportTwo cameras at each weighing bay: one reads the licence plate, one looks down on the load. They record to a recorder on site. Every time a truck is weighed and a ticket is written, the system pulls the camera frames from that minute and checks them against the ticket: is this the plate and the truck the ticket names, is the load visibly full on arrival and empty on exit, is the net weight possible for a truck of that size, and did the truck spend a normal time on the bay for that truck. When a load leaves for the factory, the weight it left with is compared with the weight that arrived, and the journey time with the usual time for that route. A ticket that passes needs nobody's attention. A ticket that does not arrives with its frames attached, for a person to review.
Red flagsA centre off the path to its target for two weeks running. A transfer that arrives lighter than it left beyond the band. A weight implausible for the vehicle. A truck on camera with no matching ticket. A plate that matches but a truck that does not. A bay that took twice as long as usual. Each with its figures or its frames attached.
PeopleExceptions go to the manager as leads for review, not as accusations. The presence of the cameras does part of the work on its own. The system does the rest, and a camera on the recorder itself records whoever unplugs anything.
Ask the plant

Which centres are behind the season target, and is it volume or price?

Two of eight. Centre D is 14% behind on volume with price on budget: deliveries dropped after week 41, when a competing buyer opened nearby. Centre F is on volume but paying 6% above budget per tonne since week 43. The other six are on or ahead of the path. Weekly detail attached.

Centre performance · week 44 · path to season targetLive
CentreVolume vs pathCost / tLossTrend Centre A+4%On budget1.2%Ahead Centre B+1%On budget1.8%On path Centre C−2%On budget1.5%On path Centre D−14%On budget1.6%Slipping · wk 41 Centre F+2%+6%1.9%Price · wk 43
Network at 97% of the path to target · 2 centres for review · Figures are examples, not client data.
Ticket 4821 · Centre B · bay 1 · 10:42Verified
Net weight3,140kgGross 6,890 · tare 3,750 · 7 t truck
Time on bay11minThis truck's average 10 min · centre average 12
Camera checks · frames at 10:31 and 10:42
Plate matches ticketYes Vehicle type and colour match historyYes Load visible, full on arrival, empty on exitYes Net weight plausible for vehicleYes · within 7 t range People on the bay2 · driver and clerk
Transfers · Centre B to factory · this week
DateTruckLeft (kg)Arrived (kg)Gap MonAB 441218,42018,210−1.1% TueAB 773117,96017,700−1.4% SatCD 118018,65017,560−5.8% · review
Illustrative. Plates, names and figures are examples, not client data.
Management layer

Above the floor sits the management view: the questions the board asks, the reports that take a week to prepare, the figures nobody fully trusts. The same records that run the floor and the accounts can answer them live.

Management layer · 04 · Finance and control

A finance analyst the board can question, live.

For a group with several sites, the purchases, expenses, payroll, stock and sales live in the ERP and the accounting system. Getting an answer means asking finance, waiting for an extract and reconciling it by hand. The board sees the figures at the monthly meeting, by which time the month is gone.

SituationQuestions asked in the management group chat, answered days later from spreadsheet extracts. Trends spotted at year end. Control checks run occasionally, by hand, by whoever had time.
What we buildA nightly read-only mirror of the ERP and the accounting system into a secured analysis environment, and an analyst that lives in the management team's group chat as a member of it.
How it worksManagers ask in plain language: the period, the question, the decision. Purchases by supplier, expenses by site, payroll against output, stock against sales, any KPI against budget and against last season. The analyst answers with figures, sources, a data cutoff and stated uncertainty, as a message or as a Word, Excel or PDF document.
ScheduledA daily operations and cash report each morning. A weekly KPI pack against budget and seasonal target, with the trend behind each figure. A board pack drafted from the same record, reviewed before it circulates.
Control checksRecurring checks on purchases, payments, payroll and stock movements, whose exceptions arrive as leads for review, not accusations.
ControlsWorks on a copy, never on production. The database login is verified read-only before every run. Reports are approved in the group before anything circulates further.
LanguagesEnglish and French, in the same group.
  • Evidence, cutoff and assumptions stated on every material claim.
  • The team keeps the decision, the approval and the distribution.
Management group · Finance topicAnalyst online
Finance director · 08:12How has our purchase cost per tonne moved this season against last, by supplier, and where is payroll going?
Analyst · 08:14Purchase cost per tonne is up 3.2% overall. One supplier carries most of it.
SupplierThis seasonLast seasonChange
Supplier A412 / t405 / t+1.7%
Supplier B448 / t411 / t+9.0%
Supplier C398 / t402 / t−1.0%
Supplier B's price rose while its volume fell 14%. Payroll per tonne processed is down 4% on higher throughput; overtime at Site C is up 22% in October and worth a look. Workbook with monthly detail attached. Sources: purchase ledger, payroll journal, weighbridge ledger · cutoff 31/10 23:59 · seasons aligned by week
Finance director · 08:21Approved. Add it to the board pack.
Analyst · 08:21Noted. Version 2 recorded as approved and added to the board pack draft. Circulation outside this group waits for your list of recipients.
Daily report delivered 06:30 · weekly KPI pack Monday5 control checks run · 2 exceptions for review
First step

Bring us the process. We build the system.

Tell us which part of the operation you cannot see clearly, or which decision you want better inputs for. We map the process, design the system around it, and put it to work in weeks.

Lisbon · Abidjan